On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Pablo Castro
<pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached 
> closure. At this point I would be fine with either one of a) postpone to v2 
> and agree that for now we'll just do binary collation everywhere or b) the 
> last form of the proposal sent around: extra "collation" argument (following 
> BCP47 plus whatever the UA wants to allow) in createObjectStore/createIndex, 
> plus a collation property to interrogate it; no way to change the collation 
> of a store/index once created.
> Given that this turned out to be a more elaborate topic than I had originally 
> expected and that it doesn't seem to have a lot of traction right now, my 
> preference would be to postpone to v2. Thoughts? Once we make a call I'll 
> make sure the spec reflects it.

I'd be fine with postponing it. However I don't think that the counter
proposals that we've received will work, so I don't think that there
is a reason to postpone.

/ Jonas

Reply via email to