On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Pablo Castro <[email protected]> wrote: > We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached > closure. At this point I would be fine with either one of a) postpone to v2 > and agree that for now we'll just do binary collation everywhere or b) the > last form of the proposal sent around: extra "collation" argument (following > BCP47 plus whatever the UA wants to allow) in createObjectStore/createIndex, > plus a collation property to interrogate it; no way to change the collation > of a store/index once created. > > Given that this turned out to be a more elaborate topic than I had originally > expected and that it doesn't seem to have a lot of traction right now, my > preference would be to postpone to v2. Thoughts? Once we make a call I'll > make sure the spec reflects it.
I'd be fine with postponing it. However I don't think that the counter proposals that we've received will work, so I don't think that there is a reason to postpone. / Jonas
