On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote: >> >> Jonas's suggestion of adding another argument to postMessage, and >> Gregg's generalization to declare it as an array of objects to be >> transferred rather than copied, sounds good. > > We could change make MessagePort and ArrayBuffer both inherit from a > [NoInterfaceObject] empty interface, and then make the MessagePort[] > argument of the various postMessage() methods instead take an array of > this new interface, and then just have ArrayBuffer and MessagePort both > define how to be cloned in this way. > > If people like this approach I can work with Kenneth on getting the > wording right in the various specs.
This sounds good to me; in the interest of moving things forward, are there any objections? -Ken