On 6/2/11 3:53 PM, David Levin wrote:
The mechanism:* needs to have an intuitive feel for developers, * must preserve backwards compatibility, * should ideally allow the port to function the same regardless of whether the message was cloned or transferred.
I'm not sure what you mean by that third item... the obvious meaning, which is that clone vs transfer is not black-box observable to the code calling postMessage makes no sense.
There are three ideas for how to accomplish this:
4. Having separate arguments (in some order) for the ports and the list of objects to transfer.
-Boris
