On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Kenneth Russell <k...@google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: >>> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote: >>>> >>>> Jonas's suggestion of adding another argument to postMessage, and >>>> Gregg's generalization to declare it as an array of objects to be >>>> transferred rather than copied, sounds good. >>> >>> We could change make MessagePort and ArrayBuffer both inherit from a >>> [NoInterfaceObject] empty interface, and then make the MessagePort[] >>> argument of the various postMessage() methods instead take an array of >>> this new interface, and then just have ArrayBuffer and MessagePort both >>> define how to be cloned in this way. >>> >>> If people like this approach I can work with Kenneth on getting the >>> wording right in the various specs. >> >> This sounds good to me; in the interest of moving things forward, are >> there any objections? > > No, this sounded good to the people here at mozilla that I talked with > about this.
Apologies but I misunderstood something about this proposal and it no longer seems desirable. I've followed up on the other (forked) thread. -Ken