On 7/4/2011 6:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/4/11 12:23 PM, John J. Barton wrote:
By restricting mutation listeners to explicitly avoid DOM mutation, the
most sophisticated case is no different than the simple case. Then all
three can be accommodated.
If such a restriction were feasible, it might be worth looking into.
It would involve not passing any DOM nodes to the mutation listener, I
suspect.
All I am asking is a few minutes of reasonable consideration for
alternatives before many thousands of person hours become invested in
the proposed mutation events replacement.
jjb
