On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > While issuing a ton of patent exclusions for something like this would be > rather poor, I would frankly rather have that then a spec that doesn't get > any attention from a party that's clearly relevant only to have patents come > up /after/ the spec is published and implemented. Agreed, but for that we need to go through rechartering this group to include the new deliverable (i.e., to give everyone a fair chance to say if they are willing to give up their IPR around this). I think your concerns are fair.
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG... イアンフェッティ
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapp... Robin Berjon
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the We... イアンフェッティ
- Re: Adding Web Intents to t... Robin Berjon
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Charles Pritchard
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Robin Berjon
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Charles Pritchard
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... イアンフェッティ
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Marcos Caceres
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... イアンフェッティ
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Marcos Caceres
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... イアンフェッティ
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Robin Berjon
- Deconstructing Intents ... Charles Pritchard
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Robin Berjon
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... James Hawkins
- Re: Adding Web Intents to t... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Adding Web Intents ... Ms2ger
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapp... Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG delivera... Adrienne Porter Felt
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG del... Paul Kinlan
