On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > > Splitting this up into two different things is great. > > Allowing attaching an alternative shadow tree through CSS but disabling > any JS to be run seems like the right thing to do.
You wouldn't want to disable any JS. Just the API defining aspects. > I'm also in favor of the "is" attribute. Even though I think that > <x-foo> is more readable than <div is="foo"> it is hard to argue about > the issues regarding parsing and fallback behavior. The "is" attribute > also provides a better behavior for common cases such as when you want > to extend <select> and <button>. Agreed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
