On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:58, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Roland Steiner wrote:> On a second note, what you > essentially seem to demand is swapping out > > entire HTML sub-branches based on presentation. > > It's not how I would describe it (I wouldn't expect the shadow trees to be > written using HTML), but to a first approximation, sure.
Intriguing - could you elaborate on the above? Do you mean shadow trees should not use HTML, but something different? (If so, what instead? pure JS?) Or do you mean shadow trees should not be defined in the HTML of the main DOM and then swapped into the shadow trees? If the latter, I fully agree. Cheers, - Roland