+1 , separate mail list, task force, joint deliverable,  participation of 
members of both WGs.  Is there any problem remaining?

but use "DAP" instead of "DAPI" in your communications, Art :)

thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:36 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:

> On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
>>> Under 'Additions Agreed':
>>> * Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
>>> 
>>> Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was 
>>> only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting nor 
>>> denying a joint deliverable with DAPI).  The status of the joint 
>>> deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon as of 
>>> yet.  It may be best to reword this to state that the possibility still 
>>> exists, so those not in attendance don't get the idea that we agreed to a 
>>> joint deliverable at the meeting.
>> My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that Chaals 
>> supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't object to a 
>> joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP as-is but I don't 
>> recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed to drift towards joint 
>> work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a joint deliverable was 
>> accepted, Jonas (amongst several others) specifically requested that this 
>> happen on a separate mailing list. So unless we are keen to rathole on 
>> politics I'd suggest we just go with that, no? An additional plus is that 
>> doing it jointly means we can start right now and not wait for WebApps to 
>> recharter.
>> 
>> I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon.
> 
> As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected to a 
> joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with cooperating 
> with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most expeditious and practical 
> way forward is to create a list for related discussions.
> 
> -AB
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/10/31-webapps-minutes.html#item06
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to