+1 , separate mail list, task force, joint deliverable, participation of members of both WGs. Is there any problem remaining?
but use "DAP" instead of "DAPI" in your communications, Art :) thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:36 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote: >>> Under 'Additions Agreed': >>> * Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG >>> >>> Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was >>> only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting nor >>> denying a joint deliverable with DAPI). The status of the joint >>> deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon as of >>> yet. It may be best to reword this to state that the possibility still >>> exists, so those not in attendance don't get the idea that we agreed to a >>> joint deliverable at the meeting. >> My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that Chaals >> supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't object to a >> joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP as-is but I don't >> recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed to drift towards joint >> work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a joint deliverable was >> accepted, Jonas (amongst several others) specifically requested that this >> happen on a separate mailing list. So unless we are keen to rathole on >> politics I'd suggest we just go with that, no? An additional plus is that >> doing it jointly means we can start right now and not wait for WebApps to >> recharter. >> >> I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon. > > As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected to a > joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with cooperating > with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most expeditious and practical > way forward is to create a list for related discussions. > > -AB > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/10/31-webapps-minutes.html#item06 > > > >
