On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:36:24 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@nokia.com>
wrote:
On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
Under 'Additions Agreed':
* Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement
was only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting
nor denying a joint deliverable with DAPI). The status of the joint
deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon
as of yet. It may be best to reword this to state that the
possibility still exists, so those not in attendance don't get the
idea that we agreed to a joint deliverable at the meeting.
My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that
Chaals supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't
object to a joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP
as-is but I don't recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed
to drift towards joint work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a
joint deliverable was accepted, Jonas (amongst several others)
specifically requested that this happen on a separate mailing list. So
unless we are keen to rathole on politics I'd suggest we just go with
that, no? An additional plus is that doing it jointly means we can
start right now and not wait for WebApps to recharter.
I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon.
As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected
to a joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with
cooperating with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most
expeditious and practical way forward is to create a list for related
discussions.
Agreed.
cheers
--
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
