On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Glenn Maynard <gl...@zewt.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is counter to the whole premise of Workers, which should be independent 
> of their renderer process and certainly not block themselves while waiting 
> for responses from the renderer (which inherently describes an async 
> behaviour). 
> 
> That's backwards.  The premise is that the renderer (UI) will not be blocked 
> by workers, not that workers won't be blocked by the renderer.

No, it's not. Messaging should not block either process. 

> 
> > Sync apis are sore thumb in GlobalWorkerScope's world.
> 
> I don't know what that means.  Synchronous APIs are one of the major reasons 
> to have Workers in the first place.

Considering the current messaging API and the allowed host APIs, I strongly 
disagree. 



> 
> -- 
> Glenn Maynard
> 

Reply via email to