On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Levin <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems like this mechanism would deadlock a worker if two workers send > > each other a synchronous message. > > Indeed. We can only allow child workers to block on parent workers. > Never the other way around. > So the api would have to know who is listening to the other end of the port and throw if it isn't a parent? dave
