On 2011-11-22 09:17, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Martin Kadlec<[email protected]> wrote:
Only reason why XPath is "dead" on the web is because there is not (yet) easy
way to use it.
It's worth noting that XPath in browsers is XPath 1.0 which doesn't
have a smooth evolutionary path to XPath 2.x, so browser XPath is an
evolutionary dead end unless forked on a different evolutionary path
than W3C XPath.
...
Henri,
could you elaborate on what you mean by "no smooth evolutionary path to
XPath 2.x"? (Are you referring to specs or to implementations?)
Best regards, Julian
