On 12/6/11 7:01 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
I'm also concerned at use of the terms "limited" and "very limited" to label "current implementations" as being both subjective and relativistic - and it implies that attempts to implement have ceased; particularly next to "well deployed", "Largely deployed", "Growing", and "Getting deployed". Either remove that column, or present some data to which you can underpin each of the labels.
Yes, more objective data would be good; perhaps just point to some source like CanIUse?
