On Wednesday, 7 December 2011 at 00:47, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 12/6/11 7:01 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > I'm also concerned at use of the terms "limited" and "very limited" to
> > label "current implementations" as being both subjective and relativistic -
> > and it implies that attempts to implement have ceased; particularly next to
> > "well deployed", "Largely deployed", "Growing", and "Getting deployed".
> > Either remove that column, or present some data to which you can underpin
> > each of the labels.
>
>
>
> Yes, more objective data would be good; perhaps just point to some
> source like CanIUse?
I guess that also raises the question about where caniuse is getting their data
from? And how they keep it up to date? (might have a good answer, just have not
looked at that site in a while)
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
