Ken, > I'm not sure that adding close() to Transferable is a good idea. Not > all Transferable types may want to support that explicit operation. > What about adding close() to Blob, and having the neutering operation > on Blob be defined to call close() on it?
Specifically, you think this is not something ArrayBuffer should inherit? If it's also a bad idea for MessagePort, then those are really our only two use cases of Transferable right now. I'm happy to create something like a close() on Blob. -- A*
