On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" <[email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]
> > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> >
> > > Chaals, Marcos,
> > >
> > > Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we have
> > > consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the spec
> > > that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we start a
> > > new CfC.
> >
> > Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references?
>
> Yep. Would appreciate that.
To move this forward more quickly, I ended up adding them myself. Please check
the doc over and let me know if it's all good to go. I think I've addressed
everything.
