On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" <[email protected] > On
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]
(mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show
we have consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of
the spec that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is
we start a new CfC.
>
> Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references?
Yep. Would appreciate that.
To move this forward more quickly, I ended up adding them myself. Please
check the doc over and let me know if it's all good to go. I think I've
addressed everything.
Looks good to me.
cheers
Chaals
--
Chaals - standards declaimer
