Art, I uploaded an update to the editor's draft [1] that aligned the three missing references with a respec biblio update pull request that is pending acceptance by Robin. So once biblio.js is updated, all of the references should work.
[1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html Bryan Sullivan On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote: > The Push API Editors would like to publish a First Public Working Draft of > their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following > spec as the basis <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html>. > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's decision > to request advancement". > > By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to begin > reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on this spec at > the time of publication; it does _not_ necessarily mean there is consensus > on the spec's contents. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this > e-mail by October 12 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and > encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > > -Thanks, AB > -- Thanks, Bryan Sullivan
