On 10/5/12 7:38 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
The Push API Editors would like to publish a First Public Working Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following spec as the basis <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html>.

This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's decision to request advancement".

By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on this spec at the time of publication; it does _not_ necessarily mean there is consensus on the spec's contents.

If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this e-mail by October 12 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal.

Although there were no objections to this CfC, Jonas raised a number of concerns in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0042.html>. Although we will have an opportunity to discuss these comments in Lyon, I would like the spec Editors to add an "Issue Block" in the Security and Privacy concerns section and include a link to Jonas' comment.

Bryan, Eduardo - I will contact you off-list about preparing the spec for FPWD. (See <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/SpecEditing> if you are unfamiliar with the W3C's TR publication process.)

-Thanks, AB





Reply via email to