On 20 Oct 2012, at 13:12, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> For various reasons, a Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates was never 
> published, although the CfC to do so passed and the ED is prepared as such 
> [widget-updates].
> 
> Since no one has raised this as an issue, I would like feedback on what we 
> should do with this spec. The main options are: 1) to stop work (and publish 
> a WG Note); 2) to move forward with the CR.
> 
> I don'tthink it makes much sense to move the spec to CR if we do not have  
> commitments for at least two independent implementations of the CR. 
> Therefore, Implementors should please speak up if they willcommit to 
> implementing this CR.

Its implemented in Apache Wookie from version 0.13.

> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> [widget-updates] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/>
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:      CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; 
> deadline May 2
> Resent-Date:  Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:42:00 +0000
> Resent-From:  <[email protected]>
> Date:         Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:34 -0400
> From:         ext Arthur Barstow <[email protected]>
> To:   public-webapps <[email protected]>
> CC:   <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> The comment deadline for the Widget Updates LCWD ended April 19. No
> comments were submitted for that document so this is a Call for
> Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of the spec using the LC
> as the basis <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-widgets-updates-20120322/>.
> 
> The Exit Criteria for the CR will be the same as that used for the other
> widget specs, namely that two or more implementations must pass each
> test case.
> 
> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process Document:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
> 
> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be
> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is
> May 2 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org.
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to