On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Adam Barth <w...@adambarth.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Adam Barth <w...@adambarth.com> wrote: >> >> My concern is not about copyright. My concern is about passing off >> >> Anne's work as our own. >> > >> > As I have pointed out above, W3C specs do not track authorship or >> > individual >> > contributions to the WG process. If Anne performed his work as author in >> > the >> > context of participating in the W3C process, >> >> This premise is false. We're discussing the work that he is currently >> performing outside the W3C process. Specifically, the changes noted >> as "Merge Anne's change" in the past 11 days: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/shortlog > > How is this different from the process being used in the HTML WG w.r.t. > bringing WHATWG ongoing work by Ian back into the W3C draft.
I am not a member of the HTML Working Group. Were I to be, I might well object to the process being used there as well. > It seems like > whatever solution is used here to satisfy Anne's concerns should be > coordinated with Ian and the HTML5 editor team so that we don't end up with > two methods for acknowledgment. That might be worth doing, but it does not remove my objection to this working group publishing this document. Adam
