On 1/22/13 12:20 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Tobie Langel <to...@fb.com> wrote: >> There are benefits to both approaches. I would be in favor of having a >> repository per spec (named tr_shortname-testsuite). This will make it a >> lot easier to securely give scoped commit rights to external >>contributors >> when the need arises. > >Given how we relatively frequently move features around and have not >exactly figured out the overall architecture I don't think that's an >approach that scales. That's definitely something to keep in mind. How frequent is it that a feature moves from one spec to another (that, is outside of the continuous flow of features that migrate from HTML5 to WebApps)? Is your concern about history loss? --tobie
