On 22/01/2013 17:14 , Tobie Langel wrote:
On 1/22/13 4:45 PM, "Robin Berjon" <ro...@w3.org> wrote:
You *do* need to make the proper commitments for the test suite, but
those are much lighter and can easily be extended to all.
Moving to GitHub should be an excellent occasion to revisit how the CLA
works and provide better integration, e.g.: by using something like
CLAHub[1].
FYI we're looking at CLAHub as a possible solution for this (either
directly or with a few modifications to tie it into our systems). No
promises but it's on the table.
That's why we're proposing to ditch per-WG anything here. The way
html-testsuite is set up, we already have subdirectories for html,
canvas2d, and microdata. Those are all from the HTML WG, but they're
just listed as the individual specs. We can keep on adding more specs in
there (the Web Crypto people are looking to do that).
That sounds good to me. It's the per WG siloing I'm opposed to, not the
one repository to rule them all idea.
Good! Well, it looks like everyone agrees... If we're forging ahead, I
have admin rights to the repo so you know who to prod.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
