On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Robert Ginda <[email protected]> wrote:
> rel="include" ? > And "Inclusions" as the name? Or "HTML Inclusions"? This could work. Any objections or better names? Rob might just win this one. :DG<
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Robert Ginda <[email protected]> wrote:
> rel="include" ? > And "Inclusions" as the name? Or "HTML Inclusions"? This could work. Any objections or better names? Rob might just win this one. :DG<