On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:32 PM, François REMY <[email protected]> wrote: >> Regardless of what they assumed, there's presumably a case to handle >> older browsers that don't support it at all. If the scripts guessed >> wrongly about what the unprefixed name would be, then they'll fall >> into this case anyway, which should be okay. >> >> If they didn't support down-level browsers at all, then they're >> already broken for a lot of users, so making them broken for a few >> more shouldn't be a huge deal. ^_^ > > I can't name any currently-used mobile browser that doesn't ship with a > *MatchesSelector function. The "drop it" proposal is to break code for the > sake of breaking code.
Read the thread more closely - as always, we only suggest dropping prefixed variants *if possible*. ~TJ
