> So does this imply that someone (i.e. Hallvord :)) needs to move it > elsewhere?
Nah, it just means I should be more stringent on pushing out releases and go through the TR process (painful or not) so that the thingy with /TR/ in the URL is as up-to-date as possible. For a spec like clipboard events, which is not changing very much, it should be doable to get it to TR if I find just a little bit more time to polish it. For a spec like, say, HTML5, Anne is right that the /TR/ version can be out of date compared to the apparently ever changing editor's draft. For list discussions, editor's draft is a good reference because that's the document that is being changed. Hope that clears up the confusion :) -Hallvord
