On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 20:31, Hallvord Steen wrote:
> > So does this imply that someone (i.e. Hallvord :)) needs to move it
> > elsewhere?
>
>
>
> Nah, it just means I should be more stringent on pushing out releases and go
> through the TR process (painful or not) so that the thingy with /TR/ in the
> URL is as up-to-date as possible. For a spec like clipboard events, which is
> not changing very much, it should be doable to get it to TR if I find just a
> little bit more time to polish it.
Ha! If I had a dollar for… just put it GitHub so then you don't need to be the
only person polishing it :) If people care about the spec, then they can just
send you PRs.
> For a spec like, say, HTML5, Anne is right that the /TR/ version can be out
> of date compared to the apparently ever changing editor's draft. For list
> discussions, editor's draft is a good reference because that's the document
> that is being changed.
>
> Hope that clears up the confusion :)
>
It won't, as people are still going to end up at the wrong version.
