On 12/12/13 16:20, James Graham wrote:
On 12/12/13 15:13, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/11/13 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[IR] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers>
Looking at this link, there are passes marked for obviously incorrect
tests (e.g. see https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24077
which says that
http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/workers/interfaces/DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope/postMessage/second-argument-null.html
should fail in any conformant UA, but it's marked as passing in Opera
and Chrome.
So presumably we will need to rerun the tests in all UAs again once all
the bugs have been fixed, yes?
Yes. I have found another couple of trivial bugs in the tests which I
will fix up. I will also have a got at fixing Ms2ger's test runner to
work in a better way, sort out some way to automate the visual output,
and hopefully we can generate a new implementation report with minimal
effort.
So, I made a sample implementation report [1] using an in-browser test
runner based on Ms2ger's earlier work (see public-test-infra for more
details). The browsers are those that happened to be on my computer. I
don't intend for anyone to take these results as authoritative, and more
work is needed, but it is much better than editing a wiki. And has
revealed yet more bugs in the tests.
In time we can use this approach in collaboration with vendors to fully
automate generating implementation reports.
[1] http://hoppipolla.co.uk/410/workers.html
