Redirecting this conversation to public-test-infra.

On 12/12/13 13:01, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 12/12/13 7:31 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote:

First I ran the tests using
https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/test-runner/src on a local server, but
then I couldn't think of a straight-forward way to put the results in
the wiki so I just ran the tests manually, too. :-( Since most tests
are automated it's silly to run them manually and edit a wiki page. Is
there a better way?

Re automated running, there is <http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite>
but I think it is considered obsolete (and isn't maintained). Test
automation is/was on Tobie's ToDo list. I'll followup separately about
the status on public-test-infra.

Ms2ger has a simple in-browser runner which we could adapt to use a top-level browsing context rather than an iframe, and to use the manifest file generated by the script in review at [1].

(Re using a wiki for the implementation report, to produce the Web
Messaging and Web Sockets implementation reports, I created a script
that merges tests results from individual runs and outputs the wiki
table syntax.)

Yeah, so I forsee this taking longer to output than to actually do the run (which I can fully automate for gecko). We should agree on a simple format that can be produced by any kind of automated runner and make a tool that can turn that format into an implementation report. Something like

[{test_id:string|list, status:string, subtests:[{name:string, status:string}]}]

Seems like it would work fine. The test id would either by the url to the top-level test file or the list [test_url, cmp, ref_url] for reftests. The harness status would be something like OK|TIMEOUT|ERROR and the subtest statuses would be something like PASS|FAIL|TIMEOUT|NOTRUN.

If we do something like this I can likely organise for such output to be automatically generated for every testrun on gecko, so producing an implementation report for any feature would just be a matter of importing the data from the latest nightly build.

[1] https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/440

Reply via email to