* Olli Pettay wrote: >We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default >we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance >reasons, but normal tasks or nanotasks could be possible too.
This sounds like adding a switch that would dynamically invalidate assumptions mutation observers might make, which sounds like a bad idea. Could you elaborate? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
