On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> * Olli Pettay wrote: >>> We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default >>> we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance >>> reasons, but normal tasks or nanotasks could be possible too. > > Right, we need some sort of a switch. I'm not certain if we want to add it > as a per-observation option or a global switch when we create an observer. My > guy feeling is that we want the latter. It would be weird for some mutation > records to be delivered earlier than others to the same observer.
s/guy/gut/. Also by “a global switch”, I mean per-MutationObserver object. Not some global switch on window/document. - R. Niwa
