From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:[email protected]]
> Using NamedConstructor is identical to doing:
>
> ```js
> class Foo { ... }
> let Bar = Foo;
> // now I can do "new Foo()" or "new Bar()", to the same effect.
> ```
Not true, since the constructors take different arguments. Instead it is
equivalent to
```js
class Response {
constructor(body, init) { ... }
...
}
function RedirectResponse(url, status = 302) {
return new Response(???, ???);
}
RedirectResponse.prototype = Response.prototype;
```
> What invariants are you concerned about?
In particular, we have that
```js
RedirectResponse.prototype.constructor !== RedirectResponse
(new RedirectResponse(...)).constructor !== RedirectResponse
// Also, omitting the `new` does not throw a `TypeError`, like it does for real
constructors.
```
and possibly a few others I am forgetting.
