> The sole reason for these sync XHRs, if you recall the OP, is to pull in libraries that are only > referenced deep in a call stack, so as to avoid having to include > *all* the libraries in the initial download.
If that is true, wouldn't it better for him to switch over to ES6 Module imports and an appropriate transpiler, for now? I'm a bit confused as to why it doesn't appear this idea was ever mentioned. Sincerely, James Greene Sent from my [smart?]phone On Sep 4, 2014 7:19 AM, "Robert Hanson" <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote: > SO glad to hear that. I expect to have a fully asynchronous version of > JSmol available for testing soon. It will require some retooling of > sophisticated sites, but nothing that a typical JavaScript developer of > pages utilizing JSmol cannot handle. > > I still have issues with the language in the w3c spec, but I am much > relieved. > > Bob Hanson > > > >