On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Domenic Denicola <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > No need to make this a "vs."; we're all friends here :). > > FWIW previous specs which have needed to become abandoned because they were > superceded by another spec have been re-published as NOTEs pointing to the > source material. That is what I would advise for this case. > > Examples: > > - http://www.w3.org/TR/components-intro/ > - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html > - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0295.html (search for > "Fullscreen")
CSS just did it for a bunch more specs, too, which had been hanging around since forever without any update or interest. This sounds like the best way to go. ~TJ
