On 11/7/14 9:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
what you do want.)
I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.
Please give me @X and @Y in: <a href=@X>@Y</a>. (Doing so offlist is
fine ;-)).
Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't
especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is
especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list.
Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD?
Ooops. I did mean "... is NOT especially harmful".
or bug tracker.
Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be
included.
Why would I want feedback on this Note?
The bugzilla component is for the spec.
(It's cool with you that I keep using the WebAppsWG product?)
I think we already have a precedence for doing this, so yes, this is
fine with me.
-Thanks, AB
