On 11/7/14 12:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
07.11.2014, 17:53, "fantasai" <[email protected]>:
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
[Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
It would be nice if editor's draft points to
https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or
not.
Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests?
I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note.
I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate.
It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the
currently-maintained draft.
Yeah, the point is that we are not maintaining a draft and WHAT-WG are.
OK, so I just checked in a patch that sets the Latest Editor's Draft
points to Anne's document
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html>.
