I believe so; this will give many specs a baseline WebIDL document to point to in their references at the very least. Many specs don't rely on the more advanced feature set being defined in WebIDL Second Edition.
However, let's not hijack this thread; I'd love to hear what the next steps are for moving this v1 forward. If there are bug fixes and improvements that need to go back to v1, than I'm volunteering to help get that work done. -----Original Message----- From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 1:36 PM To: Travis Leithead Cc: Yves Lafon; Adrian Bateman; public-webapps Subject: Re: Help with WebIDL v1? On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Travis Leithead <[email protected]> wrote: > At TPAC, I mentioned wanting to help move along WebIDL v1 to REC. Can you > enumerate the next steps, and where I might be able to help? Thanks! Is there any actual value in doing this, since v2 has many additions, improvements, and bug fixes over the contents of v1? ~TJ
