On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Yves Lafon <[email protected]> wrote: > Another option would be to define only the syntax and leave the bindings to > v2 only, but it wouldn't help much for testing.
Well we don't want to test something known to be wrong (e.g. sequence). And we want to retain the ability to make changes to the IDL syntax as we discover problems with it. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
