On 12/15/14 2:09 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/15/14, 1:10 PM, Ashley Gullen wrote:
Why would modules affect the decision to ship HTML imports?
Because the interaction of the various import systems with each other
needs to be specified, for one thing.
But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've gotten
feedback from a number of people that imports are not solving the
problems they actually need solved. We'd prefer to not ship imports
and then need to ship yet another HTML import system that solves those
problems.
Hi Boris,
Does [Bugzilla] capture all of Mozilla's Imports concerns (or at least
the higher priority issues)? If not, who should I contact to request
capturing your concerns?
(It appears you have participated in two Imports bugs [BZ].)
-Thanks, ArtB
[Bugzilla]
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&list_id=49215&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr>
[BZ]
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&email1=bzbarsky%40mit.edu&emailassigned_to1=1&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailqa_contact1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=49216&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr>
