Ashley Gullen wrote:
On 15 December 2014 at 19:09, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've
gotten feedback from a number of people that imports are not
solving the problems they actually need solved. We'd prefer to
not ship imports and then need to ship yet another HTML import
system that solves those problems.
Well, imports work better for us than Javascript modules, for the
reasons I gave. I hadn't given any feedback because everything looked
great with HTML imports and I was simply waiting for it to arrive in
browsers. Maybe the process biases feedback towards the negative?
No, rather a Chrome-only writte-in-C++ "specification by
implementation" is, however nice you find it, underspecified.
I guess you never hear the chorus of "cool, can't wait!" from everyone
looking forwards to it?
Let's work through interop issues with the polyfill, first, please.
/be
