From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [] 

> I know that this a major concern to you, but my impression is that few if any 
> other people regard that as anything more than "nice to have", especially if 
> you equate "explaining" with having a public API for it.

How do you propose having a private constructor API?

How do you propose instances of the objects even existing at all, if there is 
no constructor that creates them?

This is one of those "only makes sense to a C++ programmer" things.

Reply via email to