On Jan 27, 2015 4:51 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > > In general I agree that it feels unintuitive that you can't replace a node > > with a collection which includes the node itself. So the extra line or two > > of code seems worth it. > > You don't think it's weird that before/after/replaceWith all end up > doing the same for that scenario? Perhaps it's okay..
Yeah, I think that's okay. / Jonas
