On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote: > The problem with "<shadow> as function" is that the superclass implicitly > selects nodes based on a CSS selector so unless the nodes a subclass wants to > insert matches exactly what the author of superclass considered, the subclass > won't be able to override it. e.g. if the superclass had an insertion point > with select="input.foo", then it's not possible for a subclass to then > override it with, for example, an input element wrapped in a span.
So what if we flipped this as well and came up with an imperative API for "<shadow> as a function". I.e. "<shadow> as an actual function"? Would that give us agreement? It'd be great to have something like this available. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
