I thought it would be more confusing to have separate competing proposals
in one document? They are more like three revisions of the same document
anyway, the latest one including all feedback and rationale so far:

On 3 July 2015 at 13:04, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ashley Gullen <ash...@scirra.com> wrote:
> > These conversions are covered by what I proposed in my previous email,
> so I
> > drafted another spec with them:
> > https://www.scirra.com/labs/specs/imagedata-conversion-extensions.html
> Could you please put them all in a single document? That would make it
> a bit easier to follow what is being proposed. And perhaps not use
> Respec or figure out some way to get them in a style similar to the
> original HTML Standard. This non-algorithmic way of describing methods
> is error prone.
> A new toBlob() should probably also take a dictionary as second
> argument rather than the "any" approach.
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/

Reply via email to