After publishing the post, Google has reached out and we’ve been discussing options for solving this – would you like those discussions to be on the ML, or back-channeled?
- Daniel From: Samsung account [mailto:bnw6...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:26 AM To: Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Buchner <dabuc...@microsoft.com>; firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling 2015/10/15 下午11:58於 "Arthur Barstow" <art.bars...@gmail.com<mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>>寫道： > > On 10/14/15 12:33 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: >> >> >> Hey WebAppers, >> >> Just ran into this dragon for the 1,326^th time, so thought I would do a >> write-up to rekindle discussion on this important area of developer need the >> platform currently fails to address: >> http://www.backalleycoder.com/2015/10/13/app-to-app-interaction-apis/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.backalleycoder.com%2f2015%2f10%2f13%2fapp-to-app-interaction-apis%2f&data=01%7c01%7cdabuchne%40microsoft.com%7cf6c3552c8f534236d50a08d2d57d5758%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=lcuE8v13lcW8wpNqw4KUA4L2XP%2fJ4EfFqURrpJnME34%3d>. >> We have existing APIs/specs that get relatively close, and my first >> instinct would be to leverage those and extend their capabilities to cover >> the broader family of use-cases highlighted in the post. >> >> I welcome your ideas, feedback, and commentary, >> > > Hi Daniel, > > In case you haven't done so already, perhaps the Web Platform Incubation > Group's Discourse service would be a "better" place to discuss your proposal > <http://discourse.wicg.io/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiscourse.wicg.io%2f&data=01%7c01%7cdabuchne%40microsoft.com%7cf6c3552c8f534236d50a08d2d57d5758%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3hIRe8Wwv%2bPKVVdH5HTOSzzbC76UxH6JEWmP9csIO2U%3d>>? > > -- > AB > >