Hello, Web Platform WG,

This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Pointer 
Lock using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means you consider 
the test results shows interoperability and the changes since CR are not 

The test results for Pointer Lock [All] indicate significant interoperability, 
with only one test that have less than two passes [<2].
<http://www.w3c-test.org/pointerlock/idlharness.html>; this test failure can be 
considered more of a Web IDL implementation issue. The group believes it will 
get better over time as WebIDL compliance progresses.

The current [OPEN ISSUES], #5 is about adding pointerlock to the permissions 
enum, will be fixed the next version. Another issue is about pointerlockchange 
and the accessibility tree (#1), which is resolved by a magnification software 
note added to pointerlockchange and pointerlockerror Events.

Changes since the CR publication includes:
* Specify movementX/Y to be 0 after gaps in mouse input.

We consider the change since the CR as non-substantive. See [Diff] for all of 
changes between the CR and the draft PR.

If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this 
e-mail by August 20 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and 
encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. If 
there are no non-resolvable objections to this proposal, the motion will carry 
and we will request the PR be published on August 25 2016.



[PR] http://w3c.github.io/pointerlock/publish/index-2016-PR.html
[All] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerlock/all.html
[<2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerlock/less-than-2.html 
[OPEN ISSUES] https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues

Reply via email to