On 14/08/2016 00:01, Xiaoqian Wu wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of
Pointer Lock using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means
you consider the test results shows interoperability and the changes
since CR are not substantive.

This CFC received no objections, and so it passes.

Thanks to Vincent and Xiaoqian for their work on the Pointer Lock spec.


@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

Reply via email to