Given that this “redo” is not specifically covered in the original procedure (other than a mention to “re-apply” which isn’t specific), would Mozilla and Google consider a shorter time period for cryptanalysis given the rest of the discussion has occurred? Perhaps 3-4 days?
Thanks, Dean From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:36 PM To: Dean Coclin <dean_coc...@symantec.com> Cc: Rob Stradling <rob.stradl...@comodo.com>; Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>; CABFPub <email@example.com>; Halliday, Morgan <morgan.halli...@firstdata.com>; Sidoriak, Evan S <evan.sidor...@firstdata.com> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] SHA-1 exception request On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Dean Coclin via Public <firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com> > wrote: While I'm not the technical expert here, assuming we could, wouldn't they then need to undergo the 10 day eval period? Yes
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public