Apple votes Abstain.

Curt

> On Feb 20, 2017, at 11:56 AM, Wayne Thayer via Public <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> GoDaddy votes No.
>  
> Our primary reasons for voting against are:
> There was no attempt to build consensus around this ballot. While we 
> recognize that it takes a concrete proposal to spur action, we don’t believe 
> the discussion was constructive or that nearly enough time was allowed to 
> find common ground.
> The 6-month deadline in the revised ballot represents consensus on how long 
> CAs should need to implement a change of this sort, but allowing more time 
> for planning can minimize the impact to all involved. For example:
> Giving large companies time to plan and budget for better automation or more 
> resources.
> Getting the word out to resellers who also need to notify their customers and 
> make changes to their systems.
> Allowing CAs time to work with customers to fulfill or modify prior 
> obligations such as enterprise contracts, retail sales of new multi-year 
> certificates, or reissuance of multi-year certificates.
> We’d like to understand the specific concerns driving the tight timeline and 
> weigh them against the benefits gained from a moderately later effective date.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Wayne
>  
> From: Public [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi via Public
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:18 PM
> To: CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: Ryan Sleevi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 185 (Revised) - Limiting the Lifetime of 
> Certificates
>  
> Pursuant to the consensus on 
> https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-February/009530.html 
> <https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-February/009530.html>about the 
> nature of changes during the discussion period, and the request from Gervase 
> on https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-February/009618.html 
> <https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-February/009618.html> to adjust 
> what represents the Baseline agreement, this adjusts the effective date from 
> 1 April to 24 August. While individual programs may choose to enact or 
> enforce requirements prior to that, as the Baseline Requirements capture the 
> effective point of common agreement of the bare minimum security levels, it 
> seems appropriate that this Ballot accurately reflect that.
>  
>  
> Ballot 185 - Limiting the Lifetime of Certificates
>  
> The following motion has been proposed by Ryan Sleevi of Google, Inc and 
> endorsed by Josh Aas of ISRG and Gervase Markham of Mozilla to introduce new 
> Final Maintenance Guidelines for the "Baseline Requirements Certificate 
> Policy for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" and 
> the "Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation 
> Certificates"
>  
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
> Modify Section 6.3.2 of the "Baseline Requirements Certificate Policy for the 
> Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" as follows:
>  
> Replace Section 6.3.2, which reads as follows:
> """
> 6.3.2. Certificate Operational Periods and Key Pair Usage Periods
>  
> Subscriber Certificates issued after the Effective Date MUST have a Validity 
> Period no greater than 60 months. 
> Except as provided for below, Subscriber Certificates issued after 1 April 
> 2015 MUST have a Validity Period 
> no greater than 39 months. 
>  
> Until 30 June 2016, CAs MAY continue to issue Subscriber Certificates with a 
> Validity Period greater than 39 
> months but not greater than 60 months provided that the CA documents that the 
> Certificate is for a system or 
> software that:   
> (a) was in use prior to the Effective Date;  
> (b) is currently in use by either the Applicant or a substantial number of 
> Relying Parties;  
> (c) fails to operate if the Validity Period is shorter than 60 months; 
> (d) does not contain known security risks to Relying Parties; and  
> (e) is difficult to patch or replace without substantial economic outlay
> """
>  
> with the following text:
> """
> 6.3.2. Certificate Operational Periods and Key Pair Usage Periods
>  
> Subscriber Certificates issued on or after 24 August 2017 MUST NOT have a 
> Validity Period greater than three hundred and ninety-eight (398) days.
>  
> Subscriber Certificates issued prior to 24 August 2017 MUST NOT have a 
> Validity Period greater than thirty-nine (39) months.
> """
>  
> Modify Section 9.4 of the "Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
> Extended Validation Certificates" as follows:
>  
> Replace Section 9.4, which reads as follows:
> """
> 9.4. Maximum Validity Period For EV Certificate
>  
> The validity period for an EV Certificate SHALL NOT exceed twenty seven 
> months. It is RECOMMENDED that EV
> Subscriber Certificates have a maximum validity period of twelve months.
> """
>  
> with the following text:
> """"
> 9.4 Maximum Validity Period for EV Certificate
>  
> EV Certificates issued on or after 24 August 2017 MUST NOT have a Validity 
> Period greater than three hundred and ninety-eight (398) days.
>  
> EV Certificates issued prior to 24 August 2017 MUST NOT have a Validity 
> Period greater than twenty seven (27) months.
> """
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>  
> Ballot 185 - Limiting the Lifetime of Certificates
> Status: Final Maintenance Guideline
>  
> Review Period:
> Start Time: 2017-02-10 00:00:00 UTC
> End Time: 2017-02-17 00:00:00 UTC
>  
> Vote for Approval:
> Start Time: 2017-02-17 00:00:00 UTC
> End Time: 2017-02-24 00:00:00 UTC
>  
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
> Mail List.
>  
> A vote in favor of the ballot must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A 
> vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain 
> must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not 
> be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting 
> Member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting Members 
> are listed here:https://cabforum.org/members/ <https://cabforum.org/members/>
>  
> In order for the ballot to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast 
> by Members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by 
> members in the browser category must be in favor.
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public 
> <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to